🔗 Share this article

Industry experts have shown significant caution regarding optimistic statements that US energy majors will quickly pump vast sums of dollars to fix the country's dilapidated production facilities.

Demand for Iron-Clad Guarantees

Absent an solid promise of complete repayment from the Washington, analysts expect international firms to act with significant hesitation.

“It seems premature to comment on any upcoming plans,” an official said in response.

The aggressive timeline of less than a year and a half has been publicly outlined. However, expert analyses paint a different picture.

A More Realistic Timeline

“It’s probably going to take three years for any meaningful recovery in production,” commented an energy analyst.

He suggested oil companies would likely spend:

• Year one: Sorting through new government and security contracts.
• Following phase: Investing in reconstruction of facilities.
• Year three: Starting to meaningfully increase yield.

The result could be an rise of around half a million barrels per day perhaps by the end of the decade.

Appetite Compared to Readiness for Risk

There is a critical difference between firms' attention and their appetite to invest significantly.

“I think their curiosity is an eight, on a range of ten. However, their appetite is a much lower, because there is a lack of certainty yet.”

Veteran diplomats in the region echo this sentiment. They believe that companies will publicly talk up the opportunity while in practice moving with deliberate slowness.

The Enormous Cost

The financial outlay would be colossal. Research estimates suggest that adding between half a million and a million barrels per day would require over $10 billion in investment over several years.

But, returning production to historical levels of around 2.5 million bpd could require a massive $80 billion to $90 billion over six or seven years.

The Pending Question of Government Backing

The idea of energy companies being compensated by the federal government has been repeatedly mentioned. But, formal assurances on this proposal have so far not been provided.

Without clarity is the main factor behind the sector's reluctance. Companies seek safeguards against political risk and the possibility that a different government could refuse any deal.

“It is essential to be insured against sovereign risk, that we’ve seen in Venezuela previously.”

Ultimately, while rhetorical confidence runs strong, the financial challenges suggest a road of extreme caution for any large-scale financial commitment in the country's oil sector.